I AM A FREE AMERICAN

i am an idealist. Pure and simple. I am #1genUS, and with respect to the politics of this land pretty much use #KeepItSimpleSmartie and #CommonLaw, the #DeclarationOfIndependence and #Constitution to inform my thoughts and go from there. I am reasonable and will listen to anything except lies and hate-based realities, and those I walk away from as being Stupid.

Saturday, May 27, 2006

Reason No. 3 ... Illegal Wars

Reason No. 3 ... the U.S. government is violating our Constitution its principles in continuing the funding of the War in Afghanistan and Iraq and the sundry other places where we are instigating war against the people of the earth.


"To initiate a war of aggression, therefore, is not only an international crime; it is the supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole." - Robert H. Jackson, chief prosecutor at the Nuremberg trials.


I wonder why if it was wrong for Hitler and Germany, why it isn't wrong for the United States and George Bush?


more on this subject ...

From Wikipedia ... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_against_peace

A crime against peace, in international law, consists of starting or waging a war against the territorial integrity, political independence or sovereignty of a state, or in violation of international treaties, agreements or (legally binding) assurances. The definition of crimes against peace was first incorporated into the Nuremberg Principles and later included in the United Nations Charter.

No legal authority exists for the definition of the terms "territorial integrity", "political independence" and "sovereignty". However, their face value would seem to disclose the following:

a - The "territorial integrity" rule means that it is a crime of aggression to use armed force with intent permanently to deprive a state of any part or parts of its territory, not excluding territories for the foreign affairs of which it is responsible;

b - The "political independence" rule means that it is a crime of aggression to use armed force with intent to deprive a state of the entirety of one or more of the prerequisites of statehood, namely: defined territory, permanent population, constitutionally independent government and the means of conducting relations with other States;

c - The "sovereignty" rule means that it is a crime of aggression to use armed force with intent to overthrow the government of a state or to impede its freedom to act unhindered, as it sees fit, throughout its jurisdiction.

This definition of the crime of aggression belongs to jus cogens, which is supreme in the hierarchy of international law and, therefore, it cannot be modified by, or give way to, any rule of international law but one of the same rank. An arguable example is any rule imposing a conflicting obligation to prevent, interdict or vindicate crimes which also belong to jus cogens, namely aggression itself, crimes against humanity, genocide, war crimes, slavery, torture and piracy, so that a war waged consistent with the aim of repressing any of these crimes might not be illegal where the crime comes within the limit of proportionality relative to war and its characteristic effects.


i always loved reading encyclopedias ... they are just so logical sometimes.

peace & harmony,
elaine
'freedom must be exercised to stay in shape!'

Friday, May 26, 2006

Why? Reason No. 2

i'm a random blogger ... i like to click that 'next blog' button and see what the rest of the blogging world is talking about ... i found some interesting ones, funny ones, sweet ones, nonsense ones and 'useless' ones (the ones with pictures of models ... with their clothes on, no less). but i ran across this one ... Randomness with Enthusiasm after running across a "random" blog that linked me there because of googles' adsense rules ... since i was amused by the site and decided to check out its sponsor, i clicked on the "Hurricane Katrina Relief" banner ... being a good person in general, how can you help but support that????? WELLLLLLLLLL .....

REASON NO. 2 ... where money is going ....

American Red Cross

"Five months after Hurricane Katrina set off the largest, most costly disaster relief operation in the nation’s history, the American Red Cross announced that current financial donations and pledges will cover the estimated $2.116 billion cost for its response to Hurricanes Katrina, Rita and Wilma. The Red Cross asks donors to support the ongoing needs of hurricane survivors by giving to the countless other charities and non-profit organizations that continue to raise funds for hurricane relief efforts. For a list of some agencies, visit www.usafreedomcorps.gov."

so i click ... this is what i see ... a governmental agency under the control of President George Bush ... USA Freedom Corps ... created, you guessed it, by an executive order of the President of the United States -- no Congress needed to delegate the money being collected, the Executive Office is in complete control of this "governmental agency."



And, while writing this blog, i had to go back to pick up the link, so i clicked on it again ... and this is what i see ... Bush/Clinton Katrina Fund

I always thought the America Red Cross was a citizen-based agency that collected money and distributed it on programs they thought were best for the people of the world ... they are now a funnel of money of good will to whom ?

Am I the only one who sees a problem with this?

peace & harmony,
elaine
'freedom must be exercised to stay in shape!'

Monday, May 22, 2006

U.S. Citizenship For Sale ... What's For Sale ...

yes, as my initial post on this blog indicates, i am offering up for sale my citizenship in the United States of America ...

this will include, my social security number and all rights to my "citizenship" in the current nation-state of the United States of America. insofar as the citizenship is property of me, i believe i am entitled to sell it for profit or in trade to anyone i choose.

what this means ... and what exactly is for sale ... is as follows:

When South Carolina succeeded from the United States of America, as founded under the Declaration of Independence executed on July 4, 1776, and the subsequent Constitution of the United States of America executed on, ironically enough, September 17, 1787, ceased to exist. The withdrawal of the original states who formed the nation, rendered that nation-state experiment over. The United States of America ceased to exist ... but it didn't. Fast acting by the remaining states that then formed the new corporation called "The United States of America." The remaining representatives in Congress and President Lincoln passed some legislation and transformed the legal formation of the nation-state.

Of course, we know what happened -- the country got back together --- but what really, legally happened in the reformation of the new "United States of America"?

To be a citizen of the united states of america under the principles of our founding documents, you don't have to do anything ... you just have to claim your sovereignty and be an american. there were no forms to fill out, just proclaim, "i am a sovereign person, with no higher authority over me to exercise their will or ideas of being over me. i choose to consent to be governed under these circumstances." That is the design of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution.

But, we are not currently living under the principles of that Declaration or that Constitution because those things were completely changed in the amendments to the Constitution passed AFTER the new formation of nation-state after the Civil War. Obviously, the current nation-state of the United States of America claims I am a Citizen (note the capital "C") and subjected to its laws, etc. But, I am not. The fact that I was born in the United States of America does not make me a Citizen without the rights of sovereignty, as stated in the founding documents of this nation; obviously, this feeling is much like the founding fathers of my country were not subjected to the rule of a king merely because they were born in Briton.

However, there is no 'new land' ... well, none yet. So I have to work with what reality is. OK. The nation-state claiming to be the United States of America still subscribes to the Declaration of Independence as its founding document, and the Constitution as its governing document. Insofar as the form of the Constitution of the United States until the first breach of its own rules, e.g., the failure to fully ratify an Amendment through its self-defined terms, all Amendments to the Constitution ratified after must be reconsidered based on a deceptive doctrine.

So, insofar as based on my happenstance birth in portland, oregon, and it being one of the states that comprise the United States of America, i have a 'Citizenship' based today, now exclusively based on my social security number. I did not agree to any terms or limitations when I received my social security card and my citizenship through inheritence of my parents, therefore, I believe I am entitled to sell it. As a friend wrote to me recently,

"If English royalty can sell their titles in the classified section of
'The New Yorker,' why can't you sell your citizenship? What party
line-toting Republic could object -- at least without losing their
laissez-faire cred (that's in the economic sphere. They seem to want
to get into our homes, our computers, our phones and even in your
uterus to a fare-thee-well)."

So, that's what's for sale. My inheritance: Citizen (capital "C") as used in the "operational" "Constitution" of the United States of America post 13th Amendment.

What I would consider in trade: A nice house with land for a garden, some goats and horses and a go-kart track, near the ocean.

peace & harmony,
elaine
'freedom must be exercised to stay in shape!'

P.S. on this Memorial Day, we remember all those that came before us and died along the way. rest in peace as we continue the fight for peace here.

Friday, May 19, 2006

GO "W" !!!

"Bush Wants Newcomers to Learn English" (Yahoo! Headline News)

did you read that?

is this sounding more and more like the Third Reich or is it just me?

i mean, is anyone paying any attention at all on capital hill?

i guess one slap in the face has to go with the other ... first the Wall and then complete homogenization ...

the price on the citizenship is definitely negotiable.

peace & harmony,
elaine
'freedom must be exercised to stay in shape!'

Monday, May 15, 2006

For Sale: One American Citizenship, slightly used but full of principles

you know what ... a part of me really wants to listen to what the president said today, but ... you know what? the headlines did me in, once again ...

"president orders 6000 troops to our borders" ... what ... i'm so afraid of my mexican neighbor now that i am placing an armed guard between our lawns?

mr. bush, YOU ARE A MEAN PERSON. I DO NOT LIKE PEOPLE WHO TREAT THEIR NEIGHBORS THAT WAY. I DO NOT TREAT MY NEIGHBORS THAT WAY. YOU NO LONGER REPRESENT ME.

AND, BASED ON THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE THAT FOUNDED THIS NATION, AS MODIFIED BY ME, I HEREBY INFORM YOU THAT:

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for a PERSON to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

I hold these truths to be self-evident, that all BEINGS and PEOPLE are created equal, that they are endowed with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

That to secure these rights, A PERSON JUST NEEDS TO EXIST. ONLY TO THE EXTENT WE NEED THEM, Governments are instituted among People, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed ...

That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.

But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.

Such has been the patient sufferance of this Person; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter my former Systems of Government. The history of the current president of the United States of America, GEORGE W. BUSH, is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny and Terrorism over the entire planet.

To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has violated the Constitutional Laws of this Nation, those most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden CONGRESS to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people and seeks to preclude classes of People from equal rights under the Laws, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

He uses all branches of the Federal Government for his own ends and to for the benefit of all People without prejudice, for the sole purpose of fatiguing the People and Congress into compliance with his measures.

He has issued more Executive Orders completely bypassing the House of Representatives and the Senate, never having to justify his invasions on the rights of the People.

He has eliminated the need for Congress and is acting without their consent on major issues; the States remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of creating a second class of citizenry of People.

He may have obstructed the Administration of Justice by his appointments to the Supreme Court.

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people, and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the consent of our People.

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:

For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

For depriving us, in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:

For taking away our Rights, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:

For ignoring our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.

He has plundered our natural resources, made deals with large corporations to the detriment of our natural environment, allows medicines to be administered that is known to kill the People, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty and perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow Citizens to violate and destroy the inalienable rights stated herein of other People.

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers a complete destruction of all People who will not submit to His leadership.

Since his Election, the People have tried to petition for redress in all available avenues known to them. Our repeated attempts have been answered only by repeated injury. A President whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a Free People.

We are reminded of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here and our past history since the original Declaration of Independence. We have voted and will perhaps now try the Justice System. We will appeal to their native justice and magnanimity, and we conjure them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They may too be deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold MR. GEORGE W. BUSH, as separate from me.

I, therefore, being me, a human being on planet earth, appealing to no one, but notifying all, of my intention, do, solemnly publish and declare, that this Person is free and that all political connection between me and the United States of America is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as a Free and Independent Person, I have full power to live in Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States and People may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, I mutually pledge to any other Person, my Fortune and my sacred Honor.

The signers of the Declaration represented the new, free Person of the United States of America as follows:

Elaine Marie Vandenberg Clermont, born Portland, Oregon